Errata and Corrections

Corrections

Cresthaven Analytics publishes structured summaries of public regulatory actions. The underlying record is the primary source, and every brief links to it. Where our summary and the primary source disagree, the primary source is correct and our summary is wrong.

When we find an error, or you tell us about one, we correct it.

What counts as an error

A wrong date, a wrong agency, a wrong docket or file number, a misstated requirement, a misattributed quotation, a broken or wrong source link, or a summary that changes what the underlying action actually does. A difference of emphasis or judgment is not an error, and we do not silently rewrite one into agreement.

How fast

Errors that change what a reader would do (a date, a deadline, a requirement, a scope) are corrected within one business day of confirmation. Everything else is corrected within five business days.

How corrections are marked

A corrected brief carries a dated correction note at the foot of the page saying what was wrong and what it now says. We do not remove the note later. If the error reached subscribers by email, the correction goes out on the next scheduled brief for that agency, marked as a correction, and immediately as its own message when the error was one of the action-changing kind above.

Withdrawals

If a brief is wrong in a way a correction cannot repair, we withdraw it. The page stays at its URL and says the brief was withdrawn, on what date, and why. We do not delete published pages, because a URL that used to say something and now returns nothing is worse than one that says it was wrong.

Telling us

Write to [email] with the brief URL and what you believe is wrong. You do not have to be a subscriber. We reply to every report.

What this service does not do

Cresthaven Analytics is an intelligence product, not a compliance certification, an audit, or an assurance engagement. Nothing published here certifies that an agency was monitored without interruption, that a given action was captured, or that our coverage of any agency, sector, or period is complete.

Our monitoring can miss things. Sources change their publication format, feeds go down, and an action can be published somewhere we were not looking. Where we know our coverage of a period is incomplete, we say so on the artifact itself and show the gap as a gap. An absence of briefs is not a statement that nothing happened.

You remain responsible for your own regulatory determinations. Our briefs are an input to that work and are not a substitute for it, and they are not legal advice.

Public pages and preview coverage

Public brief pages and sector previews are a deliberately narrowed view: the content is older than what subscribers receive, it covers fewer agencies than the smallest paid plan, and it carries no alerting. It is a sample of the product, not the product, and it should not be read as coverage of a sector.