Section 230 platform liability
Section 230 liability exposure is the defining legal pressure point for Technology, AI and Competition firms right now, with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice both advancing positions that treat algorithmic amplification as a form of editorial conduct that existing immunity may not cover. Courts have not settled this, and Congress has not acted, but the regulatory posture from those agencies has shifted enough that general counsel are no longer treating Section 230 as a reliable shield for AI-mediated content decisions. That gap between statutory text and agency enforcement theory is where the current risk sits.
Watch
- KOSA and SHIELD Act proposals: potential carve-outs that narrow Section 230 for minors
- FTC unfair practices theory applied to algorithmic recommendation systems on major platforms
- DOJ amicus filings in appellate cases redefining 'information content provider' scope
- EU Digital Services Act compliance creating a parallel liability floor that U.S. firms must reconcile
Recent material activity in Technology, AI & Competition
-
NIST releases updated AI Risk Management Framework companion guide for critical infrastructure
NIST published AI RMF 1.1 companion guidance specifically addressing AI deployment in critical infrastructure sectors including energy, financial services, and healthcare. The guide introduces mandatory risk assessment c…
Read a full sample brief →